PASSIVE SOLAR DESIGN for TIMBER BUILDINGS

Energy efficiency and green living are fast becoming buzzwords, thanks to recent conclusive evidence that our activities as humans are contributing directly towards an increase in CO2 emissions and, as a result, global warming. Problems regarding electricity supply from Escom have further highlighted the need for energy efficiency – from a sustainability point of view we may one day be thankful for the awakening created by this problem. We are advised, and correctly so, to consume less, completely switch off appliances when not in use, install geyser blankets, lower the thermostat, and minimise the use of electric heaters. Despite all of this, the vast majority of new houses being built are still designed the same way they were when we were not yet aware of the urgent need for energy efficiency.

Hence the need for passive solar design – a design strategy that aims to provide maximum thermal comfort while utilising the minimal amount of conventional energy. This is achieved by taking seasonal sun angles and local climatic conditions into account, designing the orientation, shading and ventilation of the house accordingly, and selecting the building materials and their use by considering their thermal properties.

A change in seasonal sun angles is the result of the earth’s tilt remaining constant as it rotates around the sun. In December, the southern hemisphere is more exposed to the sun as the south pole is tilted towards the sun, hence our summer. In June, the northern hemisphere is tilted towards the sun resulting in our winter. The further away one is from the equator, the more the difference is between the summer and winter sun angles. At a latitude of 34 degrees (the Southern Cape) for example, the midday in mid-winter sun angle is 32,6 degrees, and the midday in mid-summer sun angle is 79,6 degrees.

Local climatic conditions in South Africa vary greatly from area to area, with a temperate Mediterranean climate along the Western Cape coast, a sub-tropical climate along the east coast, and an interior which includes cold, temperate and hot climates. Besides the obvious aim of keeping our homes warm during cold winters and cool in summer, particularly in the hot interior and sub-tropical areas, it is the fluctuation of day/night temperatures, called diurnal fluctuation, that is an important consideration in passive solar design. Generally the further inland, away from the temperature-moderating effect of the ocean, the greater the diurnal fluctuation.

The optimal orientation for achieving thermal comfort is to have the main living areas facing north and the house ideally elongated along an east-west axis for maximum penetration of north light into the house. Where facing the living areas to the north is not ideal due to other reasons, for example on a typical sea-view coastal property in the Southern Cape, with views to the south, allowance must be made for penetration of north light from the back of the house. Orientation and shading work hand in hand, as one wants low sun angle winter sunshine into the house for warmth, and the shading of high angle summer sunshine. This is achieved by eaves overhangs and shading devices designed in accordance with sun angles. The period during which we would typically want minimal sun penetration into the house in South Africa, called the shading period, would be from around late October to late February, and this equates a sun angle of 67 degrees and above.

In cold conditions, most of our heat loss occurs through the glazing, which should ideally be used minimally to the south. In the case of a southern sea view as in the above example, double glazing should be considered. Double glazing at this stage is rarely used in South Africa, and due to the small market is still relatively high priced. As the cost of energy rises and awareness of sustainability increases, this may start becoming more viable and more popular, with a resulting decrease in relative cost.

Optimal ventilation, for summer cooling, and to provide a flow of fresh air, requires consideration of the design and location of window and door openings for effective cross ventilation. Convective ventilation, based on the principle that warm air rises, is achieved with high level windows or roof space vents. A typical problem in a vaulted roof space where this is not allowed for is that warm air which moves upwards by convection is then trapped below the ceiling, and radiates warmth downwards, causing overheating.

Materials, with regard to their appropriateness according to thermal properties, can be evaluated in terms of their insulation and thermal mass retention properties. As a general rule, lightweight materials, such as timber, have high insulation values, and high mass materials, such as concrete and masonry, have lower insulation values and high thermal mass retention properties. Lightweight construction methods, such as timber frame, have the additional advantage of providing a hollow wall cavity which can be filled with insulation material appropriate to the local climate.

In the selection of a material, or a combination of them, according to climatic zone, the higher the diurnal fluctuation the more important it is to incorporate materials of high thermal mass in the construction to take advantage of this. For example, a timber frame house built on a conventional masonry foundation and concrete slab in a hot semi-arid region, with correct orientation and shading, would allow the sun to penetrate the building during a warm winter’s day warming up the concrete slab. At night, the concrete slab, as it has high mass retention, would still be warm, and would slowly give off its heat during the cold night. The highly insulated timber frame walls play their role by keeping this heat in. During summer, the windows, as they are shaded, allow minimal direct sunlight into the house. The concrete slab, with its high mass, having cooled the night before, in addition acts a heat sink, absorbing heat. Thermal mass could also be achieved by building a large stone or masonry fireplace or the incorporation of any other elements of high mass.

In moderate or sub-tropical climate zones, with a typically lower diurnal fluctuation, thermal mass is of less importance and lightweight timber frame construction, or solid timber construction, is ideally suited. In moderate climate zones some high thermal mass materials are recommended, in combination with highly insulated walls to keep the building warm in winter.

In the sub-tropical climate zone, where the idea is to keep the building cool, high levels of insulation and correct shading, particularly to the north and west, are important and thermal mass is not required. Ventilation and the capturing of the breeze for cooling are most important, and raising the house on poles often assists with this.

In very cold climates, timber buildings are ideal, as when having to heat the building by conventional means, such as a fireplace or electrical or gas heaters, the low mass walls don’t absorb any of the heat but provide excellent insulation. In a masonry house, by comparison, the high mass walls absorb heat from the heat source and provide little insulation.

It is often claimed that timber homes are as a rule cooler in summer and warmer in winter than their conventional masonry counterparts. This is true as they are a lot better insulated. When cold, they will respond a lot quicker to a conventional heat source such as a fireplace or heater. In order to achieve optimal passive solar design however, along with correct design in terms of orientation, shading and ventilation, they are often best used in combination with some materials of high thermal mass such as concrete, masonry or stonework.

Posted in Passive Solar Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

TIMBER FRAME HOMES: Designing for Sustainability

Rational and Compact design

When evaluating the sustainability of a building material, it needs to be considered in terms of its energy use, its impact on the carbon cycle and its environmental impact. Timber is finally getting its due recognition and publicity for its sustainability credentials, both as a renewable resource, for its low embodied energy and for its low carbon footprint, and is set to become an increasingly popular choice for prospective new homeowners and developers wanting to follow a ‘greener’ path.

 

There are many reasons to choose timber as the primary material for a building a new home. If sustainability is one of these there are several design strategies that can be incorporated to further enhance the sustainability of a new timber frame building. The key aim of these design strategies is to maximise the utilisation of timber; by smart design, making the best use of properties unique to the material, reducing waste and enhancing durability. 

1.  Making the best use of the unique properties of Timber

Timber has a high strength to weight ratio, with its highest strength running parallel to the grain. While as a material it provides considerable flexibility in design, in terms of efficiency, it performs best with clearly defined and logical load paths. The process of rational construction calls for, for example, trusses to be seated directly above first floor wall studs which in turn fit directly above floor joists which are directly lined up above ground floor wall studs. Similarly a post on a suspended floor structure supporting a ridge beam would have a support post to the ground directly below it. These principles can reduce excessive lintels and heavy beams and if applied correctly, can lead to a logical clarity in the design of a timber building, particularly where the structural and loadbearing elements are exposed to view. 

When designing for energy efficiency, materials need to be evaluated in terms of their thermal properties, namely insulation and thermal mass retention properties. An important factor in favouring properties of either insulation or mass retention is the diurnal fluctuation (day night temperature variation) of a particular region – generally the further inland, away from the temperature-moderating effect of the ocean, the greater the diurnal fluctuation. Lightweight materials such as timber have high insulation values and low thermal mass retention properties while the reverse applies for high mass materials such as masonry. In coastal and other areas of low diurnal fluctuation, timber is the ideal material due to its insulation properties, as well as the opportunities afforded for insulation in the space within a timber frame wall. It’s easier to heat a timber house than a masonry house as the timber walls provide more insulation while absorbing less of the heat. In dry inland areas with high diurnal fluctuation, energy efficiency would best be achieved by including elements of high mass, such as a masonry fireplace, or concrete floors, within a timber building, which would absorb heat during the day and emit this at night, so doing moderating the temperatures and reducing energy required for artificial heating and cooling. In summer these elements of high mass act as a heat sink at night, which help to keep the building cooler during the day. This principles need to be applied in conjunction with passive solar design, by designing to shade elements of high mass in summer, and allowing them to collect heat from the low angled winter sun.

2.  Reduce Wastage

 

Specification of the grade and type of timber product, and particularly the avoidance of over specification, can have a large impact on efficiencies and wastage. For example the specification of large sections of high strength and aesthetic quality grades will result in the creation of more waste. The same applies when specifying timber cladding, flooring or panelling as ‘select’ or ‘clear’. Timber is a natural product, each piece is unique, and more acceptance of variations in colour, texture and pattern, and acceptance of the occasional knot, will go a long way in reducing wastage. In other words more appreciation is required of the material as a natural product. The specification of locally grown plantation timber further reduces energy costs when compared to the environmental impact of transporting imported timber. Specification of FSC approved timber, as is already the standard practice in many countries, will in the future also become the norm, and will both drive the need for more forestry operations in SA to obtain certification, as well as ensure that our timber remains a renewable resource.

Resource efficient design is the practice of designing to maximise the utilisation of a material. As timber, for example, comes in standard lengths in increments of 300mm, it makes sense to rather design a deck say, of 3m wide, than 3.2m; which would result in a 200mm off-cut of each piece of decking. Similarly the practice of placing studs at 400 or 600mm centres is resource efficient, as this coincides with typical internal partition board widths of 1200mm – and if the plywood manufacturers would eventually join us in the metric era you could stop having to cut off that extra 20mm from each sheet of 4ft wide plywood!

3. Enhancing Durability

Correct detailing of externally exposed timber serves to enhance durability. Timber should be kept dry wherever possible, by providing eaves and protective flashing, and should always when wet shed water, for example by bevelled edges. It goes without saying that all timber should be preservative treated to SANS specifications, but homeowners also need to made aware that where, for example, TBTN treatment is used for external timber, the timber needs to be regularly coated with a suitable sealer to maintain the integrity of the preservative. Moisture traps should be avoided and natural ventilation provided, particularly below suspended floor structures. End grain should not be exposed to weather in such a way that water lingers. Where timber is in a very exposed situation it should be fixed in such a way that it could be easily replaced if necessary, for example screwed in place instead of nailed.

General design strategies for enhancing sustainability

 

Besides design strategies unique to timber as discussed above, there are also many general design strategies that can be applied. Among these some key points are:

-          ‘touch the earth lightly’, ie. collaborate and work with the landscape rather than utilising energy changing it

-          Think big rather than building big, ie create the effect of spaciousness rather than creating large spaces, for example by washing surfaces with light (eg light on ceilings by using clerestory windows), and use large openings to ‘borrow’ space from the outside. If we can meet the functional needs of our clients by building less floor area we are going a long way towards consuming less materials.

-          Apply the principles of Passive Solar design, such as correct orientation for north exposure, glazing and deep eaves or verandas to allow the penetration of low angle winter sunlight and shading to minimise direct sun into the house from late October to late February, adequate insulation (particularly in the roof) to reduce unwanted heat loss and gain, provision of elements of thermal massing to store heat and to provide a heat sink and adequate ventilation, especially in the summer months, by the use of cross-ventilation and cooling by utilising the prevailing summer winds

-          Utilise active Sustainability strategies such as rainwater harvesting and solar water heating

-          Reduce the demand for freshwater by specifying dual flush toilets and low flow showerheads, and waste water can be separated into grey and black water to enable reuse of grey water, for example, for recycling and re-use for flushing toilets

-          Minimise storm water runoff where possible by using interventions such as ‘green’ living roof systems, bioswales, and the use of permeable walkways and paving

-          Design specifically for the locality of the building, taking local conditions, microclimate, rainfall, and locally available materials into account

Sustainability, as a concept, is all about what we leave behind for future generations. The main aim, above all, in terms of sustainable design, should therefore be to  create buildings with a timeless architectural quality, an enduring aesthetic appeal, adaptable or easily modifiable over time, and beautiful within their environment, so that future generations, rather than wanting to remove and replace them, will to want preserve and live in them.

Posted in Sustainability | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Energy Efficiency: Understanding the new Building Regulations in South Africa

Energy efficiency in buildings, up to recently, has been a matter of choice. Having an energy efficient building is now, however, no longer just the preserve of those wanting to do the right thing – what was a voluntary standard was written into law in Sept 2011 and was implemented and has become applicable as of 11 Nov 2011. These are the new SANS 10400-XA: Energy Usage in Buildings, and SANS 204: Energy Efficiency in buildings. The only exception, as with the other new building regulations, is that where the design work on a project had commenced prior the publishing of the standard, an application may be submitted to the Local Authority within 6 months of the standard’s publication date, requesting that the application be dealt with in accordance with the prior regulations.

Not be confused with sustainable or ‘green’ building, which include criteria such as mbodied energy and renewable materials (i.e. timber); energy efficiency focuses only the energy usage of a building once the building is built. Typical issues effecting energy efficiency include orientation towards north, window sizing and positioning, shading, choice of materials with regards thermal and insulation properties, solar heating, natural cooling and daylighting. It is the planning and design of these aspects that are stipulated by the new regulations. SANS 10400-XA provides the ‘deemed-to –satisfy’ requirements for compliance with the National Building Regulations with regards energy usage, and SANS 204 specifies the design requirements to achieve the required levels of energy efficiency. An example of a deemed-to-satisfy requirement is, in the case of fenestration, where the total fenestration area is only up to 15% of the total floor area. It is in this case assumed that, given all the other requirements are met, such a building would not overheat or loose excessive heat due to fenestration. If the percentage is over 15% , which would be the case for most non-economic type housing ( or Victorian style houses with small windows) we get referred to the tables in SANS 204, which provide solar exposure factors for windows depending on orientation and climatic zone, as well as a host of other info, on which our calculations are based.

The success or not in achieving energy efficiency is the sum of many parts, as per the issues above, and in essence part XA tells us what sum of parts is required and SANS 204 provides guidelines and options on how to achieve this. As a rule, good design in terms of energy efficiency (as per SANS 204) will prevent the need to add potentially expensive measures, ie double glazing to large south facing windows (where a huge amount of heat loss would occur) or extra shading to west facing windows (which would otherwise cause the house to overheat), in order to meet the minimum requirements.

Below are some examples of the types of specification requirements:

Walls: Non-masonry walls shall achieve a minimum total R-Value of R2,2 in climatic zones 1 and 6, and an R-Value of R1.9 in climatic zones 2,3,4 and 5

Climatic zone map | Differentiation by climatic zone is an integral part of the regulations

Roofs: The insulation of roofs have been determined as the single biggest factor impacting on energy efficiency and this is where the most radical departure from ‘but this is the way we’ve allways done it’ (for the most part anyway) is required.

The mimimum R-Value of roof assembly ( ie all components of the roof and ceiling) required in Zones 1 and 4 is R3.7 with the other zones only marginally less. This means, for a clay tile roof for example, that once one has deducted the R value of the tiles, ceiling, airspaces etc. another 3.3 of R-value is still required by adding insulation. This equates to around 150mm of a typical cellulose fibre insulation, which is a lot more than has generally been specified up to now. For roof’s with exposed rafters it is even going to change the way we detail the roof construction – as with our current method of putting insulation between 76mm purlins there simply is’nt going to be anough space.

Solar Hot Water Heating: 50% of all hot water in new houses needs to be produced by methods other than electrical element heating – which, as solar water heating geysers still partially use electricity, it basically means all hot water must be supplied by solar water heating systems, or alternatively a heat exchange type heatpump.

Lighting: Lighting now also needs to be specified (as apposed to as previously just indicating a light point on the plan), taking in consideration light levels, energy demand and energy consumption.

So now, as designers, we really have our work cut out for us. I foresee some teething problems with the new regulations for some time yet as designers as well as local authority plans examiners get to grips with the new requirements. All architects an

d designers have to do a two day course in order to be recognized as ‘competent persons’ as required by the regulations in order to do the calculations, and expect some further delays in plan approvals until the building plans examiners are up to speed with the process.

While there has been a knee-jerk reaction and a cry of yet more over-regulation by some, this is a very necessary and well timed intervention in averting an energy crises. It is acknowledged world wide that the buildings are a massive consumer of energy, and this will position the construction sector in South Africa, as in some other parts of the world, as a leader in the move towards a sustainable future.

The standards can be purchased from :
https://www.sabs.co.za/index.php?page=standardspurchase

Posted in Energy Efficiency | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

2011 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 2,900 times in 2011. If it were a cable car, it would take about 48 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Save on your pocket and the environment by using solar water heating

With the recent introduction of the Eskom rebates installing a solar water heater as apposed to a conventional electrical geyser has become a no-brainer, and that’s besides the obvious environmental benefits.

Never mind the usual blurb from the solar suppliers about how long (or soon) it takes to pay off your new solar geyser, given the current interest rate environment, the Eskom rebates and looming further hikes in the cost of electricity, installing a solar water geyser when building a new house can in fact give you a positive cash flow from the outset.

Using the example of a 200litre geyser (suitable for a 3-4 person household) the numbers look like this:

Expect to pay around R21 000 for an Integrated Solar Geyser. That’s the type where the geyser is attached to the panel and is visible on your roof. If you don’t fancy the look of having a geyser on your roof add around R2000 for a split system – where the geyser is fitted inside your roof and only the panel is visible. The Eskom rebate will be in the region of R6000, so once you have duly filled in and submitted the requisite forms (with the solar supplier) and received your rebate within 8 weeks ( see http://www.eskomidm.co.za/residential/residential-technologies/steps-to-claiming-your-rebate  for more info) you will have effectively paid around R15 000 ( or R17 000 for a split system). Make sure the sytem you are buying qualifies for a rebate as not all systems do. If building a new house factor in the cost of a typical 200litre electrical geyser, which would of set you back around R5200. So for a new build the additional cost of going solar would be R 9 800 or R 11 800 respectively.

The solar suppliers estimate that monthly savings in electricity by heating your water with solar can save up to 40% of your electricity usage. Lets be conservative with that figure and assume an average minimum saving of 30%. Assuming a monthly household current electricity cost of R500 that would represent a saving on electricity bills of R150 per month.

The guarantees on solar heating systems vary from 5 to 10 years, and suppliers claim that their systems will last for as long as 20 years. For the purposes of this costing I will assume that a solar heating system will remain operable for 10 years. If one finances the additional cost of the solar heating system over the conventional geyser, over a period of 10 years at the current prime rate of 9% (using your existing bond for instance to do this) the monthly payback will be R149,47 per month for the split system (R11 800 borrowed at 9% over 10 years), or R124.14 for the integrated system – effectively the same or less than your immediate saving in electricity costs. And that is before Eskom gives us their next 25% increase! Sure interest rates are lower than ever and will start increasing again but that is a cyclical price movement. Electricity costs will only move upwards.

What about your existing house? For replacing your existing geyser with a solar water heating system you of course can’t deduct the cost of your current old geyser. In this case the monthly repayment, calculated on a 10 year loan on the same basis, for the total cost of the solar heating system (less the Eskom rebate), would be R 215,34 for the split system and R190.01 for the integrated system. So while the cash flow wouldn’t be immediately positive (unless you can get that saving up to 40%) it will only take 2 years at the current estimated Eskom price hikes before it is.

In addition going solar will help the environment and reduce your carbon footprint. The reason for this is that the production of electricity from coal is a direct cause of global warming due to the emissions of CO2 during the coal burning process. Furthermore, at 93%, South Africa uses the highest percentage of coal as a means of production of electricity globally ( see http://www.worldcoal.org/coal/uses-of-coal/coal-electricity/ ) – so any reductions in your electricity use will largely offset your carbon footprint and benefit the environment.

Posted in Energy Efficiency | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

2010 in review

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Minty-Fresh™.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

The Leaning Tower of Pisa has 296 steps to reach the top. This blog was viewed about 1,200 times in 2010. If those were steps, it would have climbed the Leaning Tower of Pisa 4 times

In 2010, there were 9 new posts, not bad for the first year! There were 33 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 68mb. That’s about 3 pictures per month.

The busiest day of the year was May 10th with 33 views. The most popular post that day was PASSIVE SOLAR DESIGN for TIMBER BUILDINGS 23 June 2008.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were timberdesign.co.za, healthfitnesstherapy.com, facebook.com, alhome-finance-guide.com, and yabadaba-doo.com.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for archicad non residential buildings, timber homes, green building materials, south africa timber homes, and sustainability of timber as a building material.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

1

PASSIVE SOLAR DESIGN for TIMBER BUILDINGS 23 June 2008 May 2010

2

‘Green’ timber homes November 2010
1 comment and 1 Like on WordPress.com,

3

TIMBER: A Sustainable Building Material 14 October 2008 May 2010

4

Custom architectural design vs pre-design May 2010

5

The design of the Interbuild House November 2010

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘Green’ timber homes

Presentation delivered at the Institute of Timber Frame Builders 2010 General Meeting,  on 28th October 2010

The need for  ‘Green

We are all aware that our planet is basically in a mess:

  • we are faced with the threat of unprecedented global warming, most of which is now known beyond any doubt to be manmade
  •   in terms of resources we’ve reached the point where current demand exceeds supply, so we’ve started eating into our capital
  • worst still, the waste we produce is polluting the depleting remaining capital, further reducing the effective balance
  • we face a potential energy crises

So why should this effect what and how we build? The reason quite simply, is because the construction industry and the built environment consume:

  • 50% of all resources globally
  • 45% of all electricity generated to run the built environment, plus an additional 5% during construction, which in turn directly contributes to carbon emissions and therefore global warming
  • 70% of all timber products

 

So the built environment can be considered the ‘low hanging fruit’ with regards improving our situation, as any improvements in the way we construct can have a real positive effect on our environment.

It is this awakening that is leading to:

  •   changes in consumer awareness resulting in more eco-conscious choices
  • future adaption of government policies and regulations in most developed countries with regards energy use of buildings, mostly calling for either net zero emission or carbon neutral buildings by around 2020
  •   At home in SA we have the SANS 204 code, Energy Efficiency in Buildings, which while currently serving as a guideline will in the near future become mandatory

Carbon Neutral Buildings

In order for a building to achieve net zero operating emissions, it must, once built not require any more energy than it produces. In order for a building to be truly carbon neutral they need to have net zero emissions in their construction, operation and the embodied energy of materials – so while perhaps possible by 2020 with new technologies, we are still a long way off.

So, how do we go about getting closer to achieving carbon neutrality?

We start by aiming to achieve net zero operating emissions, and to do this we look at a range of initiatives and technologies such as:

  • passive design
  • on-site generation of energy from renewable resources
  • efficient appliances & light fittings
  • purchase green power (when this option is available in SA)
  • optimising, upgrading or removing heating, ventilation and cooling systems

To get closer to Carbon Neutrality, we also need to consider;

  • reducing the embodied energy in materials (embodied energy is all the material to produce, manufacture, transport and install a material)

Timber: a ‘Green’ building material

Why is timber considered to be a ‘Green’ building material?

  • Timber is a truly renewable resource
  • Timber as a material is already carbon neutral. Further than that, because of the carbon sink effect of forests, timber from sustainably managed forests can actually be better than carbon neutral (which could offset some of the non timber materials in the building)
  • Using timber rather than other building materials can save on average 0.9 tonnes of CO2 per cubic metre of material used 
  • Timber has the lowest embodied energy of any mainstream building material –   ¼ of that of brick and 1/5 of concrete for example
  • Timber has better insulation properties (higher R-value) than most building materials; 5x better than concrete, 10x better than brick

Source: www.woodforgood.com

‘Greener’ design for Timber

While selecting the correct materials is a step in the right direction, much of what is required to achieve a ‘green’ home goes beyond just material choice. It also requires the correct design strategies.

The key aim of these is to maximise the utilisation of timber (remembering that 70% of all timber consumed is used in construction); by smart design, making the best use of properties unique to the material, reducing waste and enhancing durability. 

Making the best use of the unique properties of Timber

Timber has a high strength to weight ratio, with its highest strength running parallel to the grain. While as a material it provides considerable flexibility in design, in terms of efficiency, it performs best with clearly defined and logical load paths. The process of rational construction calls for, for example, trusses to be seated directly above first floor wall studs which in turn fit directly above floor joists which are directly lined up above ground floor wall studs.. These principles can reduce excessive lintels and heavy beams and if applied correctly, can lead to a logical clarity in the design of a timber building, particularly where the structural and loadbearing elements are exposed to view. 

When designing for energy efficiency, materials need to be evaluated in terms of their thermal properties, namely insulation and thermal mass retention properties. An important factor in favouring properties of either insulation or mass retention is the diurnal fluctuation (day night temperature variation) of a particular region – generally the further inland, away from the temperature-moderating effect of the ocean, the greater the diurnal fluctuation. Lightweight materials such as timber have high insulation values and low thermal mass retention properties while the reverse applies for high mass materials such as masonry. In coastal and other areas of low diurnal fluctuation, timber is the ideal material due to its insulation properties, as well as the opportunities afforded for insulation in the space within a timber frame wall. It’s easier to heat a timber house than a masonry house as the timber walls provide more insulation while absorbing less of the heat. In dry inland areas with high diurnal fluctuation, energy efficiency would best be achieved by including elements of high mass, such as a masonry fireplace, or concrete floors, within a timber building, which would absorb heat during the day and emit this at night, so doing moderating the temperatures and reducing energy required for artificial heating and cooling. In summer these elements of high mass act as a heat sink at night, which help to keep the building cooler during the day. This principles need to be applied in conjunction with passive solar design, by designing to shade elements of high mass in summer, and allowing them to collect heat from the low angled winter sun.

Reduce Wastage

Specification of the grade and type of timber product, and particularly the avoidance of over specification, can have a large impact on efficiencies and wastage. Timber is a natural product, each piece is unique, and more acceptance of variations in colour, texture and pattern, and acceptance of the occasional knot, will go a long way in reducing wastage. In other words more appreciation is required of the material as a natural product.

Resource efficient design is the practice of designing to maximise the utilisation of a material. As timber, for example, comes in standard lengths in increments of 300mm, it makes sense to rather design a deck say, of 3m wide, than 3.2m; which would result in a 200mm off-cut of each piece of decking. Similarly the practice of placing studs at 400 or 600mm centres is ‘resource efficient’, as this coincides with typical internal partition board widths of 1200mm.

Enhancing Durability

Correct detailing of externally exposed timber serves to enhance durability. Timber and should always when wet shed water, for example by bevelled edges. Moisture traps should be avoided and natural ventilation provided, particularly below suspended floor structures. End grain should not be exposed to weather in such a way that water lingers.

Design a building which will be enduring in terms of aesthetics

Sustainability, as a concept, is all about what we leave behind for future generations. The main aim, above all, in terms of sustainable design, should therefore be to  create buildings with a timeless architectural quality, an enduring aesthetic appeal, adaptable or easily modifiable over time, and beautiful within their environment, so that future generations, rather than wanting to remove and replace them, will to want preserve and live in them.

The current state of the building industry and the trend towards Green

We have been through one of the worst downturns in the construction industry for some time and all indicators point to the fact that recovery is going to be slow. In fact it has been said that the new ‘normal’ once the market has recovered, will be nowhere close to where the old ‘normal’ was.

There is a change occurring though.

As we slowly emerge from the recession, and the number of enquiries I receive certainly is’nt increasing dramatically, it is the change in the nature of the typical enquiry that is more relevant.

In the past if someone enquired wanting to find out about getting a timber house designed, it was more than likely because they simply liked the idea of living in a timber home. Today, I am just as likely to get an enquiry from someone wanting a ‘green’ home, and as a result of that they are considering building a timber home.

So while the market for new construction is still trying to pick itself up, there has been a growing trend in interest in ‘green’ buildings. Consumers have been made aware, thanks largely to the media, (just about every décor magazine has had a special ‘green’ issue) that by making the right choices they can make the world a better place  – and timber homes tick all of the right boxes.

On a brief search online, on websites such as ‘trendhunter’ and others, reveals that the current trend towards eco-homes includes consumer concerns over issues such as:

  • energy efficiency
  • healthy homes
  • harder floors (carpets are on the way out it seems)

 (note timber homes still ticking all the boxes)

…and other issues more related to design and technology such as:

  • smaller spaces (and in true American style it’s been given a catchy name; “rightsizing”)
  • alternative energy

The downside

 The downside is that every supplier of every type of product and service is claiming to be green. All it takes is for a environment unfriendly product to be made slightly less unfriendly …”eco” cement being a case in point.

Consumers are therefore hard pressed to distinguish between real ‘green’ choices and ‘greenwash’

To counter this, information needs to be accurate and backed by credentials. With so many offerings to choose from, consumers will, as they are doing overseas, start looking towards certification to distinguish between the ‘talkers’ and the ‘do-ers’. For example asking for FSC certified timber and wanting buildings the are rated by the South African Green Building council’s Green Star rating system – although it may still be some time before there is a category for single residential buildings. Expect also in future an increasing demand for eco friendly timber treatment such as tan-e.

How Design is responding to the Green movement

  • More designers, becoming aware of the shift towards green building, and are likely to start specifying more sustainable materials such as timber and designing timber homes
  • There will be a re-emergence of design strategies such as passive solar design ( re-emergence as most buildings were designed with these strategies before inventions such as heaters and air-conditioning). An example is the amount of books which have recently become available  – the architecture section at a bookshop like Exclusive Books will have a whole shelf of books on ‘Green’ buildings, Eco design and even timber homes ..whereas a year ago there would only have been a handful.
  • The tools of design have been enhanced dramatically and there will be an increasing demand for us to conduct energy modelling in the design stages.

 From CAD to BIM

Where we went from drawing boards to CAD in the 90’s, there has been rapidly increasing development in new type of design software called Building Information Modelling.

Whereas CAD is simply drawing on a drawing board enhanced to essentially doing the same thing on a computer, ie still essentially drawing lines and pictures, with BIM one actually constructs a virtual model of your building as you design, using entities such as walls, columns and slabs. As these entities can be given attributes, for example a timber frame wall with fibre cement cladding on 9mm OSB with 100mm Isotherm between the studs and 15mm gypsum board internally, it can also calculate R-values and heat retention and therefore can model overall thermal and environmental performance using add on packages specifically developed for this purpose.

A report released last month by McGraw-Hill Construction, titled “  “Green BIM: How Building Information Modeling is Contributing to Green Design and Construction,” states that the growth of the green building and the development of BIM are currently two of the most dynamic trends in the construction industry.    

 “Green building is already transforming design and construction in the U.S., and BIM has the potential to increase innovation—and design and construction efficiency,”

 “Although they have been growing independently, it was inevitable that they would converge because the analysis and simulation capabilities of modeling are such a natural fit with the objectives of green building.”

Green Design with BIM

BIM can aid green design by:

Analytical sun studies

Conducting a sun study helps the designer to evaluate and refine his project to effectively use daylight sources.

Continuous control of usage of resources

Quantities and detailed data about building components can be generated, providing the architect and the owner with valuable information about the materials used.

What-if scenarios for design optimization

The ability to run different scenarios supports the green design process.

Computer energy simulations

An example is EcoDesigner which is a plug in for ArchiCAD, which is what I am using. As soon as a design takes shape, comparative energy reports can be generated with a click. The resulting reports give feedback about the buildings energy usage, yearly running costs, and carbon footprint.

See http://www.graphisoft.com/products/ecodesigner/

Conclusion

Timber frame is used in buildings around the world. Despite statistics such as 70% of the developed world’s population live in timber frame homes; 90% in Canada and the US, and 20% in the UK, it has a relatively miniscule share of the local market and figures are hard to find. Between my own ‘guestimate’ of half a percent, and the Wood Foundation’s 2%, lets for arguments sake say timber homes make up 1% of the residential market in SA.

Why so many people in SA still choose to build in brick, something that is still done the same as it was a 100 years ago, when everything else around us is changing so rapidly, think cellphones, internet, advances in medicine, and of course the environment and the state of the world, is a mystery. My bet is that, as the pressure on resources increase and the efforts to slow down global warming escalate, and the message from the media to make the right choices gets ever louder, there will be a shift. And possibly a large one.

At our, for arguments sake, 1% of the market, even a 1% shift from brick to timber frame represents a 100% increase in demand for timber homes. A 2% shift represents a 200% increase and so on. I think our industry may soon get very busy.

Posted in Timber Frame Homes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment